Archaeology and Indian identity - recent developments in the Americas.

  • Stanisław Iwaniszewski


Short description by Editorial Team:

The article aims to describe the outcomes of interactions between pre-Columbian archaeology and the indigenous population. First it tries to explain why certain methodological approaches are present in Latin American archaeologies. It examines earlier suggestions that Latin American archaeologies were oriented toward nationalism and relate to modern national identities. Because of this, Latin American archaeologies may not focus on the subject of their studies, pre-Columbian past, as a past of modern indigenous groups. US archaeologists, tend to bring this perspective in their work both in US and in Latin American countries. Iwaniszewski discusses in several examples the outcomes of such an approach. He concludes with the important remark that use of similar approach could bring certain gains to Polish archaeology.



CARR III A., 1995, Paseo Pantera como corredor conservacionista en la selva maya,

Paper presented at Tercer Congreso Internacional de Mayistas, 9-15.07.1995, Chetumal, Q. Roo.

DELORIA Jr. V., 1992, Indians, archaeologists and the future, in: American Antiquity 57, 4, pp. 595-598. ' ' '

FREIDEL D., Scheie L., Parker J., 1993 Maya Cosmos. Three Thousand Years on the Shaman’s Path, William Morrow and Co.: New York.

FORD A., 1995, El Pilar Archaeological Reserve for Maya Flora and Fauna, Paper

presented at Tercer Congreso Internacional de Mayistas, 9-15.07.1995, Chetumal, Q.Roo.

FOWLER D. D., 1987, Uses of the past: archaeology in the service of the state, in: American Antiquity 52,2, pp. 229-248.

HODDER I., 1989, Post-modernism, post-structuralism and post-processual archaeology, in: I. Hodder (ed) Meanings of Things. MateriaI Culture and Symbolic Expression, pp. 64-78. [One World Archaeology 6], Unwin Hyman, London.

HODDER L, 1995, Czytanie przeszłości. Poznań: Obserwator.

HUMPHREY B., 1995, Community integration and conservation begins at home, Paper presented at Tercer Congreso Internacional de Mayistas, 9-15.07.1995, Chetumal, Q. Roo.

KLESERT A.L., POWELL S., 1993 A Perspective on Ethics and the Reburial Controversy, in: American Antiquity 58, 2, pp. 348-354.

LOWENTHAL D., 1994, Conclusion: archaeologists and others, in: P. Gathercole & D.Lowenthal (eds) The Politics of the Past, 302-314. [One World Archaeology, 12], Routledge, New York.

NASSANEY M. S., 1989, An epistemological inquiry into some archaeological and historical interpretations of 17th century Native American - European relations, in: S.J. Shennan (ed.) Archaeological Approaches to Cultural Identity, pp. 76-93.

[One World Archaeology 10]. Routledge: London.

OLIVÉ NEGRETTE J. C., 1988, Presencia de Vere Gordon Childe en la arqueología mexicana, in: L. Manzanilla (ed) Coloquio V. Gordon Childe. Estudios sobre la revolución neolítica y la revolución urbana, pp. 15-23. [Instituto de Investigaciones Antropológicas, Serie Monografías 2], Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, México, D.F.

SCHELE L., FREIDEL D., 1990, A Forest of Kings. The Untold Story of the Ancient Maya. William Morrow, New York.

THOMAS D. H., 1992, A Retrospective Look at Columbian Consequences, in: American Antiquity 57,4, pp. 613-616.

TRIGGER B. G., 1980, Archaeology and the image of the American Indian, in: American Antiquity 45,4, pp. 662-676.

TRIGGER B. G., 1984, Alternative archaeologies: nationalist, colonialist, imperialist, in: Man, N.S. 19,3, pp. 355-370. ’

WINTER J. C., 1980, Indian heritage preservation and archaeologists, in: American Antiquity 45,1, pp. 121-131.

WYLIE A., 1992, Rethinking the Quincentennial: Consequences for Past and Present, in: American Antiquity 57,4, pp. 591-594.
How to Cite
Iwaniszewski, S. (2002). Archaeology and Indian identity - recent developments in the Americas. Estudios Latinoamericanos, 22, 19-30.